Free · 60 seconds · No card required

Find out if Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity are citing your brand. If they're not, you'll know exactly why — and what to fix.

Run your AI Citation audit

Drop your URL. We’ll scan the page, check schema, llms.txt, E-E-A-T signals, and query four AI engines plus Google AI Overviews. Public scorecard, no card required.

By running an audit you agree to our terms and one-click-unsubscribable nurture emails.

Auditing your site…

Connecting…

Average run: 45–70 seconds. Don't refresh the page.

What this audit actually checks

  • 1Page text & structureWhether the answer to common questions is buried in marketing fluff or surfaced in skimmable paragraphs.
  • 2Schema (JSON-LD)Organization, FAQPage, Article, Product. The structured data AI engines actually rely on.
  • 3llms.txtThe newer machine-readable file pointing AI engines at your canonical brand facts.
  • 4Wikidata identityWhether your brand has a clean entity record AI engines pull from.
  • 5Live engine queriesWe ask Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity five vertical-specific questions. Then we count citations.
  • 6Industry-typical comparisonYour score vs. typical competitors in your category. (No named competitors — we don't do that.)
64
AI Citation Readiness

Your AI citation baseline is mid-pack.

Industry-typical for your category is around 58. You’re slightly ahead — but you’re losing citations on every brand-question prompt where a competitor has cleaner schema, stronger E-E-A-T signals, and a Google-compliant llms.txt setup. The 6 findings below show exactly what to fix.

Get this fixed in 60 seconds →

6 findings, ranked by impact

The fix takes us about a week. Most do it themselves in 6.

Toutmark's agents queue paragraph rewrites, JSON-LD, llms.txt, FAQ blocks, Wikidata edits, and citation campaigns — all gated behind your approval. Pricing locked in at signup.

Start your trial →